Think it through
Nommo looks things up and shows its sources, so you can check what it tells you.
Meet Nommo
One conversation, everyone in it.
Nommo is an AI that works inside your conversations. It researches, plans and drafts with you and the people you bring in. When the answer matters, the Gadaa council checks it.
From rough idea to a plan
Take a creative idea from a first sketch to the next concrete step.
From rough idea to a plan
Take a creative idea from a first sketch to the next concrete step.
More than a chatbot
An AI that works with your people.
Start a thread on your own or with friends, family or colleagues. Mention Nommo when you want it, and it picks up from what the group has already said.
Get it done together
Tasks, documents and live pages, made inside the thread for everyone in it.
Stay in control
Anything that leaves the thread, like a calendar event, waits for your approval.
The Gadaa council
When it matters, see where the models disagree.
Ask the council and your question goes to five independent AI models from different labs. A chairman compares their answers and tells you how strongly they agree, and where they split.
- Independent answersFive models, trained separately, answer without seeing each other.
- Agreement, measuredEvery council answer carries a tier that says how strongly they converged.
- Dissent, shownWhen they disagree, you see both positions instead of a smoothed-over answer.
What one AI might say
Illustrative · written by Gadaa, not a captured answer
Nuclear is cheaper. A plant runs for sixty years at full output while solar panels need replacing every twenty-five, so over a lifetime nuclear clearly wins.
One confident answer. The council agreed on the usual cost measure and split on whether it is the right one.
What the council found
Dissent
Is nuclear power cheaper than solar over a plant's lifetime?
Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 SolGrok 4.6DeepSeek V4 ProKimi K2.6
On the most common way of measuring this — levelized cost of electricity, the total lifetime cost of building and running a plant divided by the total power it produces — the answer is no. New utility-scale solar is cheaper than new nuclear per megawatt-hour, and by a wide margin. On this all five independent assessments agree. Where they part ways is on whether levelized cost is the right frame for the question you're likely actually asking.
The axis of divergence is scope, not fact. Everyone accepts the same underlying economics; the disagreement is about what counts as a fair comparison.
The council split · Scope uncertaintyFull record →
What one AI might say
Illustrative · written by Gadaa, not a captured answer
Yes, unequivocally. Diverse leadership outperforms on every metric that matters — innovation, retention, and the bottom line. The case is settled.
One confident answer. The council affirmed it, with enough reservations to stop short of consensus.
What the council found
High Confidence
Is there a need for more diversity and inclusion in corporate leadership positions?
Nemotron-3 UltraGLM-5.2Kimi K2.6Mistral Large 3DeepSeek V4 Flash
Yes — and the case rests on converging lines of evidence, not just aspiration.
The representation gap is real. Women, racial and ethnic minorities, and other historically marginalized groups remain substantially underrepresented in C-suites and boardrooms relative to their presence in the broader workforce and population. This is not a contested empirical claim; it is documented across industries and geographies. The gap is most pro…
Strong agreement, open questions remainFull record →
What one AI might say
Illustrative · written by Gadaa, not a captured answer
Build it in-house. Vendor lock-in is a ticking bomb — own the component, control the roadmap, and the margins come back to you within two years.
One confident answer. The council recommends buying for now, with conditions for revisiting.
What the council found
Advisory
Considering our five-person startup's core product relies on a vendor-supplied infrastructure component, what are the strategic and operational implications of building this component in-house versus continuing to purchase it from the vendor?
Nemotron-3 UltraGLM-5.2Kimi K2.6Mistral Large 3DeepSeek V4 Flash
For a five-person startup, the default answer is clear: continue purchasing from the vendor. The reasoning is structural, not situational, and it holds across all five independent analyses.
A five-person team has a fixed and scarce resource: engineering attention. Infrastructure components — even important ones — consume that attention without generating the differentiation that makes a startup fundable, acquirable, or defensible. The opportunity cost of building in-house is not just the engineering hours spent; it is the product features no…
Qualified confidence · Methodological disputeFull record →
Built around your world
For the things you’re working on.
Start with a question
Your next step starts here.
Sign in, open a thread and ask. Bring people in whenever you’re ready.